Ozone generator comparisons

Via attachments are 4 comparisons of ozone generator’s concentration output. The Ozone concentration verification output of ozone in ug/ml (micrograms per millimeter) is a product of the analyzer itself, as is the identification of the generator source of the ozone. The graphs 1~4 show analyses in a room at 21*degrees Celsius. This temperature is commonly used by manufacturers to show their ozone generator producing a higher ozone concentration. In fact, operational generator usage rooms are seldom used at this low of a temperature as it’s too cold. But this is how the obsolete sales game of ug/ml has been played.  “Mine is higher than yours”!

INSERT

This, by the way, is no longer totally valid.  New enlightened knowledge is contained in the newest publication (2007) by Dr. Renate Viebahn-Hansler in her English revised book “THE USE of OZONE in MEDICINE”.  My wife, Nancy, had personally spoken with her in Egypt on this important ozone medical usage, and understands through her the absolutely viable medical implications. In the Medical Clinic where I, in recent months, received 151 ozone autohemotherapy ozone injections, we followed Dr. Renate Viebahn-Hansler’s newest ozone dosage recommendations. Yesterday, 8/13/07, a different Oncologist treated me for my current episode of advanced new cancer (Previously,using ozone therapy I had been declared completely cured of cancer in October, 1997). Currently, results primarily due to autohemotherapy, show the new tumor has reduced about 37%, and shrinking. And I feel great, now. I have been through periods of time  in which I was absolutely sick.

BACK TO COMPARISONS

Let me elaborate on factors reflecting concentration variations. Most all high quality ozone manufacturers use the finest Pediatric quality oxygen regulator in the world. But most every individual regulator has ‘hiccups’ and is not minutely accurate in its slowest flow rates. To my knowledge, not one ozone manufacturer knew this until we used our fully electronic system to verify the accuracy of the lowest flow rates. The higher flow rates are reasonably accurate. For the flow rates of 1/32 and 1/8 cc/min. we check absolutely every oxygen flow regulator. Then assign each regulator to a specific generator. That specific ozone generator’s electronics are then adjusted to compensate for its assigned flow regulator’s ‘hiccups’. The limitation is in the mechanical ability of the flow regulator to precisely, consistently execute the adjustments dictated by the electronics. Until our own design electronic oxygen flow regulator is perfected and attached to the oxygen tanks used by our generators, we have to use the best regulators currently available, then electronically compensate. 

Most all minor and major autohemotherapies use the higher, accurate oxygen flow rates with their attendant accurate ozone concentrations and do not cause any medical harm what-so-ever. The lowest oxygen flow rates are used for non-invasive therapies which are not critical to the relatively minute variances. 120 ug/ml is indeed an almost infinitesimally, immeasurable ozone concentration and is not used in the majority of therapies. We, however, do use it very successfully even with its minute variances because we electronically compensate for all oxygen flow irregularities caused by the oxygen flow regulator.  

Now to a competitor’s actual calibration: At an oxygen flow rate setting of 1/32 with a set ozone concentration of 120 ug/ml (this = setting # 10 on his unit).

Initial spike to 50 ug/ml, then steady at 30 ug/ml. Then 28 ug/ml; finishing at 54 ug/ml. Low readings and variability unexplainable by any known reason.

This ozone generator is owned by us and we use it every day to treat my mother-in-law. It is only 2 years old and I have always considered it to be operating correctly, although I have never had our R&D department verify its ozone output. We did so as a direct follow through to yours and my discussions. We simply wanted to make sure we were comparing ‘apples to apples.’ Obviously we were not. As its warranty has expired, I will have our own in-house technicians ‘check it out’

Our competitor’s generator with oxygen flow set at 1/16 and ozone concentration at 120 ug/ml.  Results: Spike at 69 ug/ml, and steady at 69 ug/ml throughout test.  Quite consistent and I believe representative of its ozone output at this oxygen flow rate.